00:00
00:00
Genclops

62 Movie Reviews

14 w/ Responses

I have been a huge fan of all the work you have posted since you appeared on NG, and I found this a refreshing glimpse into a side of your art that we aren't familiar with. I really enjoyed the unique animation style. While I have a strong love for pixel art, which you do amazing work in... It was great seeing you work in a different medium.

spacefader responds:

Yeah, I actually only started drawing on the computer last year, before that I only did hand drawn stuff. Computers have made me prolific.

Love the tone of this. Good animation, good music choice- overall a classy little number.

Obviously the animation is quite possibly bar raising for newgrounds. Fantastic work.

Being a huge FFIX fan, there was an added enjoyment for me as well. But Beethoven is not evil ;)

Unoriginal jokes , poor animation

...and you used the worst version of batman/joker in the history of their existance (nolanverse) but I didnt take off for that.

Good Points:
-The Pokemon Sounds
-The Animation was classy and unique
-The Polka at the end
-With the exception of the "thundershock...thunder...whatever!!!
" line, you used all original jokes. rare in a modern pokemon flash

Bad Points
-No good jokes / meant to be funny

I wonder how many 5-star reviews this would have gotten without the big names working on it?

My guess... not that many.

The backgrounds and general art style were brilliant. You pulled off a feel with this animation that is so rich and your own. Absolutely deserving 5/5.

Everything about this was fantastic.
Very original idea, well executed, fantastic art- just very tasteful all around in a very rare way. Well deserved 5/5

Great animation and tone

The joke has been done on more than one occasion though, which wouldn't even be an issue- if it werent the entire animation.

Great flash! The animation was very tasteful and smooth and your humor was as well.

For the comments critiquing wikipedia: I think you are absolutely wrong. It is a very credible source, almost the most credible source. It can grow and change and it is policed daily by a larger staff than any formal encyclopedia could ever hope to have. The fact that it is "publicly altered" means nothing. Would prefer that it's "officially altered"? Who are these officials and why do you trust them exclusively? Wikipedia is one of the most amazing things the advent of the internet has given us. It's credibility is hardly in question. If I go on to the Newgrounds wikipedia page, and type "it was started by a group of horny baboons", It will be changed very quickly. While "just anyone" can change it, "just anyone" can correct it too. It is actually quite effective and makes one of the most comprehensive knowledge sources possible. Wikipedia is a modern marvel!

Age 36, Male

Joined on 8/5/09

Level:
4
Exp Points:
110 / 180
Exp Rank:
> 100,000
Vote Power:
3.60 votes
Audio Scouts
1
Rank:
Civilian
Global Rank:
> 100,000
Blams:
0
Saves:
4
B/P Bonus:
0%
Whistle:
Normal
Trophies:
1
Medals:
457